An open letter to Richard Dawkins

Tags

,

Dear Professor Dawkins,

I was at your presentation at the Global Atheist Conference in Melbourne last month. To be honest, it wasn’t a great talk. There were a number given with greater skill, with a passion that ignited the audience. There were people who presented an opposing view worth hearing, or simply a perspective I hadn’t thought much about.

But where you lost me was that slide referring to ‘militant disabled people’.

In the past, you’ve spoken of how the phrase ‘militant atheist’ is a joke. Because we don’t go flying planes into buildings, or blow up abortion clinics, or murder our daughters when they marry non-atheists. We may be outspoken, but outspokenness doesn’t make you militant.

Threats and harm do.

So I was interested in what makes a disabled person ‘militant’. And according to you, it’s opposing abortion of a disabled fetus.

Now, forgive me if I’m wrong, but in the past you’ve used a scale of offence to tell us what we should be concerned about. For instance, you famously said a western woman has nothing to object to compared to a woman actually experiencing life under Islam. To me, this use of logic also says that someone living a disabled life has more to say about the value of disabled lives compared to someone not disabled. If it’s all about degrees of experience, then I can’t really see how you can argue one in one direction and the other in a different one.

So, professor, where are these militant disabled people? Which abortion clinics have they blown up? Which gynaecologists have they threatened or murdered?

Or are they militant simply because they have a view you disagree with, and they have the temerity to argue it?

Sound familiar?

When you do this kind of thing you weaken your own arguments and lose respect from your audience. We all have prejudices and blind spots, but labelling a community with your prejudice is a particularly unpleasant one. There are many disabled humanists, atheists and sceptics. Like you, they have a right to speak out without being slapped down as militant.

I’d be grateful if you would give this some thought. I’d be happier if you removed that offensive slide from your presentation, and understood why it was necessary to do so.

Why a label is useful

This post from Chavisory, stopped me in my tracks. How many of these comments have I heard?

“Why do we have to pathologize everything?”

“Why can’t we just appreciate people for who they are?”

“I don’t want to label my child.”

“Labels are for soup cans.”

“But everyone has quirks.”

“Didn’t we just use to have a broader conception of normal?”

“Aren’t we all just human?”

A great post on this subject here.

So anyway…

Tags

…last weekend I took an exam, an oral in which I was given eight cases to talk my way through. [When I was at school I thought it was an aural, because you had to listen to the questions people asked you first before you speak.] Since getting back a number of people have said ‘How do you think you did?’ Every time, I reply:

‘I have absolutely no idea.’

And people think I am joking, or being self-effacing, when what I am saying is the absolute truth – I don’t have a clue. Adrift in body language at the best of times, I can’t interpret that of an examiner when I’m frantically trying to figure out what my next sentence will be.

Not for me those subtle clues to warn me I am barking up the wrong tree, or relax, you’ve said enough, you’ve passed.

I would be no more surprised to learn I’ve come bottom than that I got through. It has taken me years to realise that people ask for your opinion on how an oral went because for most of them, there is a reasonable chance they would know, in your place.

I’m back to the robots again.

But apart from that, I’ve spent the last few weeks at work being cheerful, probably offensively so. I can’t really explain why; I’m certainly not kidding myself that I’m stuffing up the interpersonal stuff any less than usual. Some of it is mirroring, which I suspect is when I get somewhat out of control, reflecting an endless type of emotion back at people. I also suspect I’m annoying them, if only because I’ve made this mistake in the past.

I want to be cheerful and outgoing. I’d prefer people thought of me as someone who was awkward and irritating but also fun to have around, rather than just a pain. I also feel happy when I’ve helped someone, and recently there have been a number of occasions when I’ve had the opportunity to sit down and listen and really try to connect with a patient. I’m getting better at this as I get older (though it worries me how bad at it I must once have been), and I like knowing that I’ve helped someone feel listened to, even if there is little I can offer on the practical front.

(I do sometimes wonder if the warm fuzzies of a sympathetic hearing carry someone all the way home until they close the front door, stop and realise Hey! She didn’t actually do anything! What a bitch!)

Anyway, here’s a kitten:

Starting a support group

Tags

,

I’m hoping to start a support group for women on the spectrum. My enthusiasm is tempered by reality; Auties aren’t joiners, we have our own ways and our own routines and comfort zones. For us, even the words support group can be innately challenging, suggesting an event where we are obliged to open up about our deepest anxieties, whether we want to or not. And yet one of the defining qualities of existence for most of us is loneliness, either an actual aloneness, bereft of friends and acquaintances, or the loneliness of difference, and most of us don’t actually want to live like this.

This would have to be an Autie-only environment. Formal diagnosis not necessary, because I think most of us have finely tuned Aut-dar and can spot each other across a room (even if we have no idea how to begin a conversation).

It has to be in a place that is comfortable and not clinical, where there is a low sensory background, enough to fill the spaces without pushing anyone to meltdown.

There needs to be a system in place to help those who want to be part of it, but panic when it comes to actually joining.

Perhaps there needs to be something to do, a craft, a discussion topic, something to distract from incipient overload.

And finally, my hope is for a community where older Auties mentor the younger ones, perhaps forming something important, something lasting, something that is for us, by us, about us, somewhere that feels like home.

I have a dream….

 

Why friendship scares me

Tags

(I’ve been off the page for a couple of months and feeling guilty, so I’ll try and make a bit more effort.)

Perhaps I should have called this Why I’m no good at friendship, but that would have a one word answer. And I have had friendships, but they ended usually with me knowing something went wrong, but unable to understand why it was such a terrible offence or what to do to apologise.

Social interaction is a minefield where I often don’t realise I’ve just been blown up, or if I do, I limp on, confused and anxious but with no idea how to turn things around. People get angry with me, or they misinterpret my intentions. Men in particular make statements like ‘you’re too complex’ or ‘you know about lots of things’ or ‘you do so much‘, and I know that they don’t mean it in a good way, but I don’t know why those things are bad things, or how to hide them if they are. And I don’t know why I should be expected to conceal them.

Thinking back over the conversations I’ve had over the last couple of weeks, the subjects have raged from Kant and deontology, the St Helens eruption, the edge of the universe (where time and space are created), Caravaggio, pain response in animals, particle physics, patriarchy and kyriarchy, DNA testing…. and that’s just the stuff I remember. Maybe it’s because, like many Auties, I view a conversation as an exchange of information. I like conversations where you talk about stuff. I don’t mind messing around with jokes and innuendo, or hearing about someone’s relationship issues, or last holiday, but I can’t have endless conversations about those things.

I like to know what the other person knows, if they have an interest I share, and if they know things I don’t. But I wish I had friends who were able to say enough, you’re on Autie overload, when I’m saying too much and they want me to stop. I wish they could understand that I don’t mean to bore and irritate them. I wish they could do this rather than waiting until I’ve annoyed them and then being angry with me, or avoiding me.

This is much more evident now I’m trying to settle in one place. I should have moved on two years ago; for the first time in my adult life I’m having to deal with people knowing me long enough to realise that the annoying things I do aren’t just slip-ups, they’re an integral part of who I am. I have had the chance to set up a house the way I want it, and it’s not what most people expect. I’m just as awkward socially as I was at the first Christmas party. I forget people’s names or fail to recognise them just as often as I did in my first months of working here.

On the up side, it’s easier to be alone in a rural area. That was brought home to me on my trip to Brisbane last weekend (to fail an exam). Walking past restaurants in the evening, full of couples, families and groups of friends, and knowing that’s a life I’ll never lead was a familiar feeling, but one I’d mostly forgotten about.

It’s easier to live life when you’re not constantly having your nose rubbed in that kind of thing.

Problem is, as a single woman of a certain age, slightly awkward and occasionally (!) socially clumsy, saying these things automatically labels you a sad spinster-type, desperately in need of a fuck. Women reassure you that the right person will come along one day, and men get a rabbit-in-headlights expression of oh, shit, she’s coming on to me. Every single time.

[With the exception of the men who assume that a couple of conversations in which they treat you like a human being means you are obliged to offer sex, because who are you to be picky?]

I’m trying to be open about being an Autie. I’m not sure what difference it makes, because if I tell people at the beginning they don’t believe me, and if I wait until I’ve messed up a few times they dismiss it as an excuse. But since my diagnosis I’ve had to accept that there are things I can’t do, things I will never understand, things that won’t improve. I have started to see how this makes a friendship with me more difficult than with a normal person, all the adjustments that someone has to make for me. And it’s a disability that’s extremely difficult to understand from the outside. Hell, many of us on the inside are still learning about it.

I don’t just have to ask someone to be a friend, I have to ask them to learn about the complexities of a neurodevelopmental condition. I have to ask them to help shield me from aspects of the world I don’t understand. They will end up having to explain me to other people, smooth over misunderstandings, respond to me in ways that seem illogical to them. I will have to trust that they care about me even when I am at my most distressed, that they want me to keep trying when it would be less effort to walk away, that they will never let me be pushed out by other, easier friendships.

And it’s too much to ask. Sooner or later it is always too much. Since I will inevitably end up back where I started, with an irritated or angry ex-friend walking away, is there any point in starting over?

This is where I’ve been…

Millennium Bridge and St Paul’s

…taking in some culture and coffee.

This photo is from a spring morning on the South Bank, visiting the Tate Modern. I went to the Damien Hirst exhibition; I’ve never seen any of his work in the flesh, as it were (yes, that’s a dreadful pun). I’ve always been a bit bewildered by Hirst, TBH. I visited out of curiosity, really. He was a gamechanger in modern art, though whether for the better has been debated for longer and with more erudition than I could ever manage.

Still, it was an interesting experience. The dead shark has presence, and watching children standing inside a cow, asking questions about its anatomy and not being remotely squicked, was fun. And at the end, well, I didn’t really have a better grasp of what the fuss was about. There was a circus aspect to it, and there was little that felt meaningful to me.

I was annoyed to find that the gallery’s Rothko paintings had been put in storage to make room for it. So, it seemed, were the staff who informed me of that disappointing fact. Interesting to discover that Tate staff seemed to come down on the ‘vastly overrated’ side of the discussion.

Maybe it’s a sensory issue, but I get far more from standing in front of a Rothko than from two hours of Hirst.

Anyway, some more travel pics to follow.

(This is my break from exam revision, BTW.)

Cara

Tags

Cara sits in the chair to my right. She looks everywhere but at me; at the floor, at my desk, at her hands. I read through the notes from my colleague’s consultation last month, and the letters from various agencies. Now twenty-two, Cara crashed out of university in what is described as a psychotic episode four years ago. Called to the lecturer’s office to discuss an unsatisfactory assignment, she refused to speak and ran from the room. Several staff attempted to restrain her, resulting in frantic head-banging until she was removed by ambulance to the local psychiatric department.

The years since then have been a pattern of admissions after similar episodes. Staff on the ward note that once she recovers she is calm and appropriate, but very scared of some of the more labile patients. She has moved from hostel to hostel, and has no friends, or support system, as one psychiatrist notes in an irritated scribble at the bottom of a discharge summary.

Cara has attracted a list of diagnoses. Her chaotic, abusive family have abandoned her, leaving her with PTSD. She is also, apparently, bipolar, schizophrenic, and has a borderline personality disorder.

She has never smoked, never taken drugs, and rarely drinks alcohol. She is on a large four times daily dose of antipsychotic. As I read and ask questions, her caseworker does nearly all the talking, and I wonder if Cara allows this because she has learned that no one ever listens to what she says.

As the caseworker is speaking, I watch Cara. She bounces her heel on the floor and taps her fingers repetitively on her thigh. She makes eye contact for a second, and then seems to panic and looks away. Someone coughs loudly in the corridor outside and she jumps—an exaggerated startle reflex.

I talk to her, but she won’t reply. The caseworker tries to answer, and I motion to her to stop.

Several things I know. Not speaking does not mean not listening. Not speaking does not mean not communicating. Not speaking is not an invitation to dismiss someone, to make decisions on their behalf.

Something else I now know, too. But that can wait.

I lay out a basic plan. I will see her at least fortnightly, and probably more often. If she needs an advocate when the mental health team are making decisions about her, I will be that advocate if she wants me to be. Everything I write, I will provide copies for her if she wishes. And most importantly, I don’t believe she has a personality disorder, or is schizophrenic, and she probably isn’t bipolar either.

Oh, so arrogant, dismissing the psychiatric department’s opinions in a single consultation.

The next week things are much the same. We do an ECG, because of the antipsychotic medication. Cara is weighed, because I don’t think drug-induced weight gain will help her crushingly low self-esteem. And through all this, she barely speaks, and looks away from me.

Four weeks later and we are still in the same place. I consider pulling out; should I let someone with more experience take over? But experience and understanding are two different things, and I know which is more important here. Instead I concentrate on reiterating my support, and I do manage to get the answer to two questions: Cara dissociates when stressed, and she dislikes being touched. Both these have been attributed to her childhood, but I wonder how she felt, that day at university, being ‘restrained’ by staff.

Our seventh meeting, and Cara has stopped the antipsychotic herself. She isn’t seeing the mental health team because they insist she has to call and make her own appointments. Cara is terrified of talking to people on the phone, but I’m the first person to understand this. And apart from a letter demanding the ECG, I have had no communication from the team. I agree that stopping the medication was the right thing to do.

Cara smiles once or twice.

Still no eye contact, but that isn’t a problem. She will answer an occasional question without prompting, and I sense a breakthrough. We talk about therapy, about how her confusion and fear and helplessness are normal feelings, after her experiences.

Cara starts psychotherapy. She comes to see me every other week, and sometimes we talk about feelings, and sometimes it’s just straightforward discussions of sleep, exercise, eating well.

On the tenth meeting I decide it’s time.

I ask her if she would agree to be assessed for autism.

It’s a big word. It carries a lot of assumptions, most of them wrong. I know she will retreat into silence, but I am ready for that. I talk about the head-banging, the meltdowns, the dissociation. The stimming when she is distressed. The odd things, like her fear of using a phone. About how so many autistic people collide unhappily with psychiatry, how it is so rarely considered as a cause of variant behaviour. That I hope we can get her back to university with special assistance, so nothing like that ever happens again. How understanding makes all of this so much more manageable.

Cara doesn’t disagree. She sits, quietly stimming, and I can see her holding this idea against what she knows of herself, wondering if it explains all those differences she can’t yet put into words. Something within her starting to uncurl, to consider the thought that she isn’t someone with a list of psychiatric diagnoses, that who she is belongs to her, and her alone.

She voices the one objection I knew would come. She has seen dozens of professionals. Why did no one else tell me this?

The question hangs in the air, sharp, glittering, dangerous.

I look down at my hands. Suddenly it’s a struggle to make eye contact. I want to rub my palms across my thighs, the way I do when I’m overloading.

It takes one to know one, I say quietly.

We sit in silence for a while.

The next question, too, is expected. Is this why no one likes me?

How to explain society’s exclusion of anyone whose social skills are impaired? To admit how often I’ve wondered if it would be better to have a visible physical disability instead of autism? As long as you can interact with other people in the way they expect, you are one of the tribe. Cara has never been one of the in-group, never known how to initiate a friendship. No one will mentor her; they will gravitate to the other, ‘normal’ students. Employers will find her weird, and however hard she works she will be singled out for not fitting in.

This is why most people don’t understand you, I counter. But we can try to change that.

There is fear, then, in her face. I know that, too. I feel it every time I leave the house, the knowledge that every conversation will balance on a knife-edge, that I will in turn irritate, confuse and mystify, and have no idea why. Society will not adjust to us, and there are few individuals willing to take the time to understand our difference. I feel closer to a non-verbal autistic child in full meltdown than I do to most ‘normal’ people.

On a sheet of paper I write a few lines. Blog addresses, websites, videos. I push it towards her. This is us.

This is how it starts. One by one, like exhausted swimmers, we pull them to safety. They sit in the boat, confused and scared, afraid to wonder if things might finally get better. And the pilots of the boats signal to one another. I’ve found one more. They’re safe. I’m bringing them home.

Because we are here, now. We are making our own community, our own refuge. Online and face-to-face we are finding each other, reaching out to support, to explain, to advocate. We are abandoning the many labels imposed on us – high functioning, low functioning, Asperger’s – in favour of one: Autistic.

You will listen to us, in the end. You will stop telling us who we are, how we feel, why we are wrong. When you say we have no empathy we will laugh in your faces. We will rescue those you have misdiagnosed, we will break down the doors and bring them out to join us. You will make no decisions about us without us.

We are autistic.

And we are on the march.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.